A Curious Absence: 9/11-Inspired American Sci-Fi Literature
Concept art for Steven Spielberg’s 2005 adaptation of War of the Worlds |
September 11,
2001, was a day that changed the world in many ways. On the geopolitical front,
it defined the Bush administration’s policy for the remainder of Mr. 43’s term—with
the declaration of a War on Terror, the passage of the PATRIOT Act, an increase
in defense spending, the questionable detention and surveillance of suspected
Islamic extremists, just to name a couple. 9/11, as it is now often referred to,
also had ramifications in pop culture, particularly in the exports out of
Hollywood. Curiously, as we shall see later in this essay, this same
prolificacy did not seem to be as much in evidence with authors of science
fiction (SF) novels and short stories.
Movies and
television shows in the years following 9/11 bore the tropes of a paranoid
populace, the fear of the “other,” and raised questions about the surveillance
state, the possibility of invasion, and numerous other threats. David M. Higgins
draws a connection between the events of that fateful date and the sudden proliferation
of alien invasion films and series:
In 2005, for example, all three major networks
released primetime sci-fi shows (NBC’s Surface,
CBS’s Threshold, and ABC’s Invasion) that focused on Earth as a
target for alien attacks. . . . In science fiction cinema, there was a
pronounced return to the alien invasion blockbuster, often in the form of
remakes of 1950s alien invasion films.
He then goes on
to enumerate examples such as Signs, Spielberg’s
The War of the Worlds, The Day the Earth
Stood Still, and other films with similar themes such as The Mist, Cloverfield, and most notably,
Marvel’s The Avengers.
Andrew Fox,
however, lamented in a 2011 article that he doesn’t see that same level of
productivity in the SF literary sphere: “Ten years have passed since September
11, 2001, and yet the destruction of the Twin Towers is referenced in only a
handful of SF and fantasy stories and novels, and the resulting Global War on
Terror in but a handful more.” Why is this so?
Higgins points
out that prior to September 11, in the late 1990s, popular science fiction was
dominated by “awakening-from-simulacrum stories.” Films such as The Matrix and The Truman Show, both of which took inspiration from Philip K.
Dick’s 1959 novel Time Out of Joint,
are vivid examples of this. Fox, on
the other hand, goes back several decades and mentions how American science
fiction writers were quick to incorporate the lessons of twentieth-century world-shaking
events, such as the Second World War and the Cold War, into their works,
whereas this same enthusiasm didn’t seem to translate as much with 9/11. He
mentions stories like “That Only a Mother” by Judith Merril, published in 1948;
“Thunder and Roses” (1947) by Theodore Sturgeon; and Wilmar H. Shiras’s novel Children of the Atom (1953). “A complete
bibliography of atomic war stories from the 1940s to the 1960s would run many
pages long and feature dozens of writers,” says Fox.
While Higgins
notes how pop culture wasted no time in embracing the effects of 9/11, Fox questions
whether the themes of that infamous date and its aftermath resonated more
strongly with mainstream and literary novelists (such as Jonathan Safran Foer’s
Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, which
itself was adapted into a film in 2012; and Claire Messud’s The Emperor’s Children) than with
science fiction and fantasy writers. Novels such as Philip K. Dick’s The Man in the High Castle and Joseph
Heller’s Catch 22 were, after all,
written in the decades following World War II—alternate history in the case of
the former, satire for the latter. Fox then raises the possibility that perhaps
the modern-day “taboos of science fiction” include an extrapolation of the
potential danger of radical Islam, citing the experience of American science
fiction writer Norman Spinrad, who, after receiving one rejection letter after
another from skittish publishers, opted to self-publish his controversially
titled novel Osama the Gun as an
e-book instead.
Higgins draws a
comparison between the rise of 9/11’s effects in movies and series and the capitalist
and neoliberalist policies that emerged in the years leading up to the
twenty-first century:
In the aftermath of 9/11, the yearning for an
exterior authenticity in the face of enervating simulacra . . . is replaced by
a simultaneous horror and fascination with the reality-effect of mediated disaster
spectacles, and simulations . . . become a widespread feature of social
totality.
He then sums up
two major tropes he observes to have defined American SF in the wake of 9/11:
First, the trope of the alien encounter (or alien
invasion) is reformulated and redeployed during this period to address an
environment of spectacular and indeterminate omnicrisis that can imaginatively
encompass threats ranging from terrorism and biological attacks to natural
disasters . . . Second, an intensification of technoscientific advancement and
neoliberal capitalist expansion leads to a pervasive experience in the West
during this time that many Americans (and others) are themselves living in a
science fictional milieu.
We thus see the
two authors make two seemingly differing observations on American SF post-9/11.
Fox, on the one hand, notes the absence of 9/11 themes in American SF novels
and stories post-2001; while Higgins, on the other, faces no loss when linking
pop culture, capitalism, and the consumer’s hunger for alien invasion and
terrorist-themed films and series, both in the before and after phases of 9/11.
But it’s worth mentioning, however, that his essay is significantly bare of
literary examples, comic book titles notwithstanding. Fox also pins this
absence’s blame on SF writer’s fears of irking another culture, lest they be
labeled discriminating or be made targets of extremists.
In contrast to the crises of the
twentieth-century, however, 9/11 was a more sudden event, one that rattled the relative
lull that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union and the triumph of
capitalist and neoliberal ideals. World War II lasted roughly five years, while
the Cold War went on for five decades, and both wars saw the unprecedented rise
of scientific advancement—great fodder for SF writers of the time. Both wars
also pitted America against a distinct foreign enemy (Nazi Germany in World War
II and the USSR during the Cold War), and both were examples of where American
exceptionalism and patriotism (one could even say jingoism) could shine. Upon
the defeat of the Soviet Union and its imminent collapse, it seemed as though
America was unstoppable, unchallenged. Capitalism reigned supreme and with it the
rise of what Nikil Saval called “office utopianism,” meaning offices that were designed
to be cities in themselves and which white-collar employees would see no reason
to leave; thus paving the way for the “awakening-from-simulacrum stories” which
Higgins described.
9/11 changed
all that. It rattled the drabness of office life—of capitalism—to its core, and
soon people felt they were living in a world straight out of an SF read. Perhaps
this is the reason why Fox decried the absence of 9/11 themes and tropes in
more recent fantasy and SF literary works—less to do with the fear of
infuriating religious fundamentalists, and more to do with not seeing its necessity in
the modern age. Pop culture, conversely, was rapid in taking its cue from such
a tragic event because consumers—movie-goers, TV viewers, comic book readers,
and gamers—responded well to it.
One can theorize
that perhaps the reason why the proliferation of 9/11-inspired themes has not
translated as well in the SF literary sphere as it did in film and television
is because authors probably see little need in treading territory that’s
already well-worn by more visual, accessible mediums. Additionally, what point
is there in writing SF novels and stories that allude to such a devastating
event, and can only do so much in propelling imaginations, when our world already
feels like its own dystopic reality?
Sources
Fox, Andrew. “The
Absence of 9-11 from Science Fiction.” Fantastical
Andrew Fox. N.p., 11 September 2011. Web. 22 January 2017. <http://www.fantasticalandrewfox.com/articles/absence-of9-11-from-sciencefiction/>.
Higgins, David M.
“American Science Fiction after 9/11.” Eds. Eric Carl Link and Gerry Canavan. The Cambridge Companion to American Science Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
Comments
Post a Comment